logo

Recommendations, connect with, and applicant sex from inside the You

Recommendations, connect with, and applicant sex from inside the You

101 . Newhagen , John Elizabeth. , “Beyond thinking-report: Having fun with latency to respond to design the question responding techniques with the web-created public opinion studies,” on the Sourcebook to have Governmental Interaction Search , eds. Bucy , Erik P. and you may Lance Holbert , Roentgen. ( Nyc : Routledge , 2011 ).Google Student

102 . Oxley , Douglas Roentgen. , Smith , Kevin B. , Alford , John R. , Hibbing , Matthew V. , Miller , Jennifer L. , Scalora , Mario , Hatemi , Peter K. , and you may Hibbing , John R. , “Governmental thinking are very different that have physiological faculties,” Science , 321 : 1667 – 1670 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

103 . Swers , Michele L. , “Try female more likely to vote to possess ladies’ points costs than just its male colleagues?” Legislative Training Every quarter 1998 , 23 : 435 – 448 .CrossRefGoogle Pupil

104 . Swers , Michele L. , The difference Women Generate: The insurance policy Perception of women inside the Congress ( il : College or university from il Force , 2002 ).Bing Student

105 . Slope , Kim Quaile and Hurley , Patricia A. , “Emblematic speeches regarding You.S. Senate and their representational effects,” Log out of Politics 2002 , 64 : 219 – 231 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

108 . Mansbridge , Jane , “Is blacks portray blacks and you will women portray women? An effective contingent ‘yes’,” Log of Politics 1999 , 61 ( step 3 ): 627 – 657 .CrossRefGoogle Beginner

109 . Sanbonmatsu , Kira , “Gender-related political education and descriptive signal of females,” Political Behavior 2003 , 25 : 367 – 388 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

110 . Dolan , Kathleen , “Is there an effective ‘gender affinity effect’ into the Western government? S. Household elections,” Political Look Quarterly 2008 , 61 : 79 – 89 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar

This informative article could have been quoted from the following the products. So it record is established according to studies provided with Crossref.

Benstead, Lindsay J. Jamal, Amaney A good. and you may Crave, Ellen 2015. Is-it Gender, Religiosity otherwise One another? A job Congruity Principle of Candidate Electability during the Transitional Tunisia. Perspectives to the Politics, Vol. 13, Situation. step one, p. 74.

Bauer, Nichole Meters. 2015. Which stereotypes female people? Determining private differences in women stereotype dependency. Government, Groups, and you may Identities, Vol. step 3, Question. step 1, p. 94.

Rosenthal , Cindy Simon , “The new role off gender in the descriptive sign,” Political Search Quarterly 1995 , 48 : 599 – 611

McLaughlin, Bryan Davis, Catasha Coppini, David Kim, More youthful Mie Knisely, Sandra and you can McLeod, Douglas 2015. When female attack. Politics as well as the Lifetime Sciences, Vol. 34, Thing. step 1, p. 49.

Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and you will Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Giving blended indicators: brand new character out-of gender and partisanship for the product reviews from people in politics. Record out of Elections, Public-opinion and Functions, Vol. twenty six, Issue. 4, p. 423.

Koch, Thomas and Obermaier, Magdalena 2016. Having Cardiovascular system and you can (No) Mind? Just how Recipients Adversely Infer Destroyed Factual statements about Political leaders and exactly how So it Has an effect on this new Evaluation of your Speakermunication Lookup, Vol. 43, Thing. seven, p. 972.

Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka and you can Olszanecka-. Stereotypes Determining Perceptions out of Feminine Political leaders: Possible out-of Poland. Politics inside Main Europe, Vol. fourteen, Issue. step three, p. 7.

https://kissbrides.com/hr/bumble-recenzija/

Schneider, Monica C. and you will Bos, Angela L. 2019. The utilization of Public Character Concept for the Examination of Gender into the Politics. Political Psychology, Vol. 40, Issue. S1, p. 173.

Playground, Sunshine Younger and Baek, Younger Min 2019. Citizens’ Ambivalence with the Feminine Political figures: As to the reasons Ambivalence Things getting Gender Equality for the an excellent Democracy. Journal of women, Politics & Policy, Vol. 40, Matter. 2, p. 309.

Rusidze, Nino 2019. Stereotypes, Profile Murder and you may Feamales in Politics. Corvinus Journal off All over the world Items, Vol. cuatro, Issue. step one, p. fifteen.

Aaldering, Loes and you may Van Der Pas, Daphne Joanna 2020. Political Management about Media: Gender Prejudice into the Commander Stereotypes during the Promotion and you will Routine Minutes. United kingdom Diary from Political Science, Vol. fifty, Situation. step 3, p. 911.

Boer, Noortje 2020. Just how do Residents Evaluate Street?Peak Bureaucrats’ Desire and Competence? Good Typology and you may Sample. Social Government Feedback, Vol. 80, Material. cuatro, p. 532.

Comments are closed.